<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nate, Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2010/01/26/nate-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2010/01/26/nate-revisited/</link>
	<description>Photos and Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: minimodi</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2010/01/26/nate-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>minimodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=1100#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>I like this! (makes me think of the movie Office space)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this! (makes me think of the movie Office space)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2010/01/26/nate-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=1100#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>An interesting comparison and yes, a definitely different image. To go even further, and more accurately see the image as you intended, it would be interesting to see both prints. The internet and viewing images on monitors has certainly expanded our ability to see more photos but it comes at the expense ( at least in my opinion) of seeing what the photographer really intended.

And, last but not least, it is a great portrait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting comparison and yes, a definitely different image. To go even further, and more accurately see the image as you intended, it would be interesting to see both prints. The internet and viewing images on monitors has certainly expanded our ability to see more photos but it comes at the expense ( at least in my opinion) of seeing what the photographer really intended.</p>
<p>And, last but not least, it is a great portrait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
