<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe at Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/</link>
	<description>Recent photographs by Walker Pickering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-510</guid>
		<description>you series with joe is really great! i love this one!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you series with joe is really great! i love this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-511</guid>
		<description>I like this one best W...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this one best W&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-512</guid>
		<description>What a fabulous series. It&#039;ll stick in my mind. The last one at the office, with no sign of imminent departure, and this really gorgeous, straight portrait. Thankyou for all these.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fabulous series. It&#8217;ll stick in my mind. The last one at the office, with no sign of imminent departure, and this really gorgeous, straight portrait. Thankyou for all these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miles</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 06:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I really love your &#039;documentary&#039; work, it&#039;s got a wonderful quality about it, it&#039;s really not like looking at a photo at all... great stuff man.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love your &#8216;documentary&#8217; work, it&#8217;s got a wonderful quality about it, it&#8217;s really not like looking at a photo at all&#8230; great stuff man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-514</guid>
		<description>To be honest, the softness most likely comes from the scan. Although, if you&#039;re just talking specifically about the fairly shallow depth of field (in this case, the blurred background), then it has largely to do with the aperture (f5.6) and film size (4x5 in.).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, the softness most likely comes from the scan. Although, if you&#8217;re just talking specifically about the fairly shallow depth of field (in this case, the blurred background), then it has largely to do with the aperture (f5.6) and film size (4&#215;5 in.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: procrastin</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>procrastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-515</guid>
		<description>great great great serie ! Beautiful use of your large format camera.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great great great serie ! Beautiful use of your large format camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mats</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2006/01/25/joe-at-home/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=201#comment-516</guid>
		<description>The last three Joe photos all have a certain softness... can&#039;t think of a better way to describe it. It&#039;s as if they are slightly out of focus, but it doesn&#039;t feel that way. It&#039;s very distinct in &quot;Joe in Becca&#039;s Office&quot;. I know nothing about analogue photography, but is it the Calumet or the film/printing process? Anyway, it&#039;s very nice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last three Joe photos all have a certain softness&#8230; can&#8217;t think of a better way to describe it. It&#8217;s as if they are slightly out of focus, but it doesn&#8217;t feel that way. It&#8217;s very distinct in &#8220;Joe in Becca&#8217;s Office&#8221;. I know nothing about analogue photography, but is it the Calumet or the film/printing process? Anyway, it&#8217;s very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

