<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe and Trooper Dudley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/</link>
	<description>Photos and Thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Betts</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Betts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=194#comment-490</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s anything &#039;unfortunate&#039; about it. Far better to come from this direction than the other. There&#039;s a lot of excitingly composed vacuity out there.  What you  have in these pictures is much harder to learn, I think, and I admire it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s anything &#8216;unfortunate&#8217; about it. Far better to come from this direction than the other. There&#8217;s a lot of excitingly composed vacuity out there.  What you  have in these pictures is much harder to learn, I think, and I admire it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=194#comment-491</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it&#039;s a fair assessment. Unfortunately, I wish it weren&#039;t the case all the time. It seems I let composition go a bit more often than I&#039;d like to admit. But I&#039;m glad you brought it up, because it&#039;s something I need to pay more attention to.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a fair assessment. Unfortunately, I wish it weren&#8217;t the case all the time. It seems I let composition go a bit more often than I&#8217;d like to admit. But I&#8217;m glad you brought it up, because it&#8217;s something I need to pay more attention to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Betts</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Betts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=194#comment-492</guid>
		<description>I agree about the square format - partly to do with association,  I&#039;m sure.  Stops the pictures from being off-hand, casual,  candid.

In the last two pictures, looking at Joe&#039;s back,  I was afraid we were saying goodbye to him too early, before the series had got under way. The more I look at this one,  the more  David and Joe&#039;s  hands become the focus of attention for me.

Forgive me if  I&#039;m shooting off before tuning in, but in this series (and looking back through your archives) it&#039;s almost as if you sometimes say   &quot;I don&#039;t do composition. Not interested in pushes, pulls, weights, tensions against the edge. WHACK! Here&#039;s the subject. That&#039;s the way it is.&quot;

Is that fair? In this series, it feels entirely appropriate . You don&#039;t intrude. No need to get clever.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the square format &#8211; partly to do with association,  I&#8217;m sure.  Stops the pictures from being off-hand, casual,  candid.</p>
<p>In the last two pictures, looking at Joe&#8217;s back,  I was afraid we were saying goodbye to him too early, before the series had got under way. The more I look at this one,  the more  David and Joe&#8217;s  hands become the focus of attention for me.</p>
<p>Forgive me if  I&#8217;m shooting off before tuning in, but in this series (and looking back through your archives) it&#8217;s almost as if you sometimes say   &#8220;I don&#8217;t do composition. Not interested in pushes, pulls, weights, tensions against the edge. WHACK! Here&#8217;s the subject. That&#8217;s the way it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that fair? In this series, it feels entirely appropriate . You don&#8217;t intrude. No need to get clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/2005/12/09/joe-and-trooper-dudley/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondmonochrome.com/blog/?p=194#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Great series Walker.  I particularly like this one and the waiting area one (which is my favorite I think). The square format works really well in the formal settings in these photos (though I&#039;m pretty partial to square format in general), and Joe seems to be a great subject.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series Walker.  I particularly like this one and the waiting area one (which is my favorite I think). The square format works really well in the formal settings in these photos (though I&#8217;m pretty partial to square format in general), and Joe seems to be a great subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
